Ion through deadenylation by the Ccr4pPop2p-Not deadenylase complex [12], [18]. Following

Ion through deadenylation by the Ccr4pPop2p-Not deadenylase complex [12], [18]. Following deadenylation Vts1p target transcripts are decapped and then degraded by the 59-to-39 exonuclease Xrn1p [18]. A similar mechanism of deadenylation-dependent mRNA decay is employed by Smg in Drosophila [15], [17], [19]. Both Vts1p and Smg interact with the Ccr4p-Pop2p-Not complex suggesting a model whereby these proteins induce transcript decay by recruiting the deadenylase to target mRNAs. Smg also regulatesmRNA translation through a separate mechanism involving an interaction with the eIF4E-binding protein Cup [20]. Cup binds to the mRNA cap binding protein eIF4E through a canonical eIF4E-binding motif (YXXXXLW, where W is a hydrophobic amino acid). Cap-dependent translation initiation involves eIF4E recruiting eIF4G to an mRNA, which indirectly mediates recruitment of the 40S ribosome [21]. eIF4G also interacts with eIF4E through an eIF4E-binding motif and thus recruitment of Cup to an mRNA inhibits translation by blocking the eIF4E/ eIF4G interaction [20], [22]. The role of Cup in Smg function led us to speculate that Vts1p might also regulate target mRNAs through an eIF4E-binding protein. While there is no Cup homolog in yeast, two eIF4Ebinding proteins, Caf20p and Eap1p, have been identified [23], [24], [25]. In addition, global genetic analysis revealed synthetically lethal interactions between Eap1p and two deadenylase components, Ccr4p and Pop2p [26], suggesting a functional relationship, either direct or indirect, among the gene products. This genetic interaction combined with the role of the Ccr4pPop2p-Not deadenylase in Vts1p-mediated regulation prompted us to test if Eap1p might function with Vts1p to regulate target mRNAs. Using two different Vts1p target mRNAs we demonstrate that Eap1p is MedChemExpress SC 1 Required for efficient Vts1p-mediated transcript degradation. Eap1p does not stimulate deadenylation but is instead required for efficient removal of the 59 cap. In addition, Eap1p-mediated stimulation of transcript decay requires binding to eIF4E. We also find that Eap1p biochemically interacts with Vts1p and is able to mediate an indirect interaction between Vts1p and eIF4E. Taken together these data suggest a model whereby the Vts1p/Eap1p/eIF4E complex stimulates transcript decapping.Eap1p Functions in Vts1p-Mediated Transcript DecayResults Eap1p is Required for Efficient Decay of Vts1p Target mRNAsTo assess the role of Eap1p in Vts1p function we first examined the stability of a reporter mRNA which recapitulates Vts1pmediated decay in vivo [12]. The GFP-SRE+ reporter encodes green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the inducible Hexokinase II Inhibitor II, 3-BP galactose promoter and has three SREs in its 39 untranslated region (UTR). A transcriptional pulse-chase approach was used 1531364 to measure the stability of reporter mRNAs by Northern blot after transcriptional induction by galactose and subsequent repression by the addition of glucose. We previously reported that GFP-SRE+ mRNA is rapidly degraded in wild-type cells while it is stabilized in a vts1D strain [18]. Here we show that rapid degradation of GFPSRE+ mRNA was compromised in eap1D cells (Figure 1A). The fact that the GFP-SRE+ mRNA was stabilized more in a vts1D strain than in an eap1D strain suggests that while Eap1p plays a role in the decay of this mRNA it is not absolutely required for Vts1p function. These data could suggest that Eap1p functions in the same pathway or a separate pathway to regulate the st.Ion through deadenylation by the Ccr4pPop2p-Not deadenylase complex [12], [18]. Following deadenylation Vts1p target transcripts are decapped and then degraded by the 59-to-39 exonuclease Xrn1p [18]. A similar mechanism of deadenylation-dependent mRNA decay is employed by Smg in Drosophila [15], [17], [19]. Both Vts1p and Smg interact with the Ccr4p-Pop2p-Not complex suggesting a model whereby these proteins induce transcript decay by recruiting the deadenylase to target mRNAs. Smg also regulatesmRNA translation through a separate mechanism involving an interaction with the eIF4E-binding protein Cup [20]. Cup binds to the mRNA cap binding protein eIF4E through a canonical eIF4E-binding motif (YXXXXLW, where W is a hydrophobic amino acid). Cap-dependent translation initiation involves eIF4E recruiting eIF4G to an mRNA, which indirectly mediates recruitment of the 40S ribosome [21]. eIF4G also interacts with eIF4E through an eIF4E-binding motif and thus recruitment of Cup to an mRNA inhibits translation by blocking the eIF4E/ eIF4G interaction [20], [22]. The role of Cup in Smg function led us to speculate that Vts1p might also regulate target mRNAs through an eIF4E-binding protein. While there is no Cup homolog in yeast, two eIF4Ebinding proteins, Caf20p and Eap1p, have been identified [23], [24], [25]. In addition, global genetic analysis revealed synthetically lethal interactions between Eap1p and two deadenylase components, Ccr4p and Pop2p [26], suggesting a functional relationship, either direct or indirect, among the gene products. This genetic interaction combined with the role of the Ccr4pPop2p-Not deadenylase in Vts1p-mediated regulation prompted us to test if Eap1p might function with Vts1p to regulate target mRNAs. Using two different Vts1p target mRNAs we demonstrate that Eap1p is required for efficient Vts1p-mediated transcript degradation. Eap1p does not stimulate deadenylation but is instead required for efficient removal of the 59 cap. In addition, Eap1p-mediated stimulation of transcript decay requires binding to eIF4E. We also find that Eap1p biochemically interacts with Vts1p and is able to mediate an indirect interaction between Vts1p and eIF4E. Taken together these data suggest a model whereby the Vts1p/Eap1p/eIF4E complex stimulates transcript decapping.Eap1p Functions in Vts1p-Mediated Transcript DecayResults Eap1p is Required for Efficient Decay of Vts1p Target mRNAsTo assess the role of Eap1p in Vts1p function we first examined the stability of a reporter mRNA which recapitulates Vts1pmediated decay in vivo [12]. The GFP-SRE+ reporter encodes green fluorescent protein (GFP) under the control of the inducible galactose promoter and has three SREs in its 39 untranslated region (UTR). A transcriptional pulse-chase approach was used 1531364 to measure the stability of reporter mRNAs by Northern blot after transcriptional induction by galactose and subsequent repression by the addition of glucose. We previously reported that GFP-SRE+ mRNA is rapidly degraded in wild-type cells while it is stabilized in a vts1D strain [18]. Here we show that rapid degradation of GFPSRE+ mRNA was compromised in eap1D cells (Figure 1A). The fact that the GFP-SRE+ mRNA was stabilized more in a vts1D strain than in an eap1D strain suggests that while Eap1p plays a role in the decay of this mRNA it is not absolutely required for Vts1p function. These data could suggest that Eap1p functions in the same pathway or a separate pathway to regulate the st.