Share this post on:

1177/1754073913477505. ?Eder, A. B., Musseler, J., Hommel, B. (2012). The structure of affective action representations: temporal binding of affective response codes. Psychological Analysis, 76, 111?18. doi:ten. 1007/s00426-011-0327-6. Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., De Houwer, J., Hommel, B. (2015). Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: an ideomotor strategy. Psychological Study, 79, 630?49. doi:ten.1007/s00426-014-0590-4. Elsner, B., Hommel, B. (2001). Impact anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Functionality, 27, 229?40. doi:ten.1037/0096-1523.27.1. 229. Fodor, E. M. (2010). Energy motivation. In O. C. Schultheiss J. C. Brunstein (Eds.), Implicit motives (pp. 3?9). Oxford: University Press. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., Magee, J. C. (2003). From energy to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.453. Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in functionality control: with special reference for the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73?9. doi:10.1037/h0028689. Hommel, B. (2013). Ideomotor action handle: around the perceptual grounding of voluntary actions and agents. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, A. Herwig (Eds.), Action Science: Foundations of an Emerging Discipline (pp. 113?36). Cambridge: MIT Press. ?Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Occasion Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action Omipalisib organizing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849?78. doi:10.1017/S0140525X01000103. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of skilled utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 375?05. a0023781 doi:ten.1162/003355397555235. ?Kollner, M. G., Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence among implicit and explicit measures from the demands for achievement, affiliation, and energy. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:ten.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826. Latham, G. P., Piccolo, R. F. (2012). The impact of context-specific versus nonspecific subconscious ambitions on employee performance. Human Resource Management, 51, 511?23. doi:10. 1002/hrm.21486. Lavender, T., Hommel, B. (2007). Have an effect on and action: towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270?296. doi:10.1080/02699930701438152. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. (2002). Developing a virtually helpful theory of purpose setting and task motivation: a 35-year a0023781 doi:ten.1162/003355397555235. ?Kollner, M. G., Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures from the requires for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826. Latham, G. P., Piccolo, R. F. (2012). The impact of context-specific versus nonspecific subconscious targets on employee overall performance. Human Resource Management, 51, 511?23. doi:ten. 1002/hrm.21486. Lavender, T., Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270?296. doi:10.1080/02699930701438152. Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. (2002). Creating a practically helpful theory of target setting and job motivation: a 35-year 10508619.2011.638589 odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705?17. doi:10.1037/0003-066X. 57.9.705. Marien, H., Aarts, H., Custers, R. (2015). The interactive part of action-outcome mastering and good affective data in motivating human goal-directed behavior. Motivation Science, 1, 165?83. doi:10.1037/mot0000021. McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values establish what people do. American Psychologist, 40, 812?25. doi:10. 1037/0003-066X.40.7.812. McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.motivating folks to selecting the actions that boost their well-being.Acknowledgments We thank Leonie Eshuis and Tamara de Kloe for their assist with Study 2. Compliance with ethical requirements Ethical statement Both research received ethical approval from the Faculty Ethics Critique Committee with the Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences at Utrecht University. All participants provided written informed consent just before participation. Open Access This article.

Share this post on: