En in Table 16 for selected compounds. We can find no data

En in Table 16 for selected compounds. We can find no data for thiol radical CPI-455MedChemExpress CPI-455 GGTI298 supplement cations, which suggests that these are high energy species with E?(RSH?/0) > 1 V and pKa(RSH?) < 0 in water. Armstrong and Surdhar used gas phase RS BDEs, estimated heats of solution and the pKas to calculate RS?- redox couples in water.316 They used BDE(RS ) = 81.2 kcal mol-1, but these values have since then been determined to be larger, ca. 87 kcal mol-1 (Table 16). Using Armstrong's thermochemical cycle with the revised gas phase BDFEs shown in Table 16 gives E?MeS?-) = 0.73 V and E?EtS?-) = 0.74 V. These values are in good agreement with later estimates of E?RS?-) for deprotonated -mercaptoethanol (= HOCH2CH2SH)317 and cysteine.318 -mercaptoethanol has better solubility in water than other alkyl thiols, and serves as a reasonable model of aqueous thiol chemistry since the thiol and alcohol moieties are not tooChem Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 8.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptWarren et al.Pagenear to each other. The aqueous potential for HOCH2CH2S?+ H+ + e- HOCH2CH2SH is E?= 1.33 ?0.02 V (HOCH2CH2SH = -mercaptoethanol).317 Applying eq 15 above gives BDFEH2O(HOCH2CH2S ) = 88.3 kcal mol-1 (and BDEH2O(HOCH2CH2S ) = 86.5 kcal mol-1 with the assumption that S 2O(HOCH2CH2S? = S 2O(HOCH2CH2SH), see above). This value is in excellent agreement with the bonds strengths calculated above from thermochemical cycles. The pKa of the S group in cysteine has long been known319 and was recently determined as a function of temperature and ionic strength.320 It is very similar to the pKa of other alkyl thiols,315 which is not surprising since the side chain is fairly separated from the amine and carboxylate groups. The RS?+ H+ + e- RSH redox potential of cysteine, determined by Pr z and co-workers, is also very similar to the values determined by Surdhar and Armstrong (see above). Thus, the PCET thermochemistry of cysteine, glutathione, and alkyl thiols are very similar. Like phenols and ascorbate, the intermediates of single proton or electron transfer of RSH species are high in energy, indicating that thiols preferentially lose H?under normal physiological conditions. 5.8 C bonds and H2 Bell, Evans, and Polanyi showed in the 1930s that the facility of hydrogen atom abstraction from hydrocarbons parallels the gas phase homolytic BDE of the C bond being cleaved. Ever since then, BDEs have been central to organic free radical chemistry, and have been widely used for solution as well as gas-phase radical reactions: the gas phase BDE is the typical starting point for understanding the reactivity of C bonds. However, it should be noted that other factors besides C bond strength affect radical reactivity. For instance, the polar effect328 of electron withdrawing substituents makes C bonds much less reactive towards electrophilic radicals such as tBuO? as illustrated above in the lack of reactivity of acetonitrile solvent with this radical.198 This portion of the review is divided into three subsections. The first presents selected thermochemical data for simple hydrocarbons and small alkylaromatic compounds. Readers interested in a wider range of compounds are referred to specialized reviews on the acidities, redox potentials, and bond dissociation energies of organic compounds. In particular, Bordwell and co-workers measured pKas in DMSO for many compounds with weak C bonds, as well as a number of redox.En in Table 16 for selected compounds. We can find no data for thiol radical cations, which suggests that these are high energy species with E?(RSH?/0) > 1 V and pKa(RSH?) < 0 in water. Armstrong and Surdhar used gas phase RS BDEs, estimated heats of solution and the pKas to calculate RS?- redox couples in water.316 They used BDE(RS ) = 81.2 kcal mol-1, but these values have since then been determined to be larger, ca. 87 kcal mol-1 (Table 16). Using Armstrong's thermochemical cycle with the revised gas phase BDFEs shown in Table 16 gives E?MeS?-) = 0.73 V and E?EtS?-) = 0.74 V. These values are in good agreement with later estimates of E?RS?-) for deprotonated -mercaptoethanol (= HOCH2CH2SH)317 and cysteine.318 -mercaptoethanol has better solubility in water than other alkyl thiols, and serves as a reasonable model of aqueous thiol chemistry since the thiol and alcohol moieties are not tooChem Rev. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2011 December 8.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptWarren et al.Pagenear to each other. The aqueous potential for HOCH2CH2S?+ H+ + e- HOCH2CH2SH is E?= 1.33 ?0.02 V (HOCH2CH2SH = -mercaptoethanol).317 Applying eq 15 above gives BDFEH2O(HOCH2CH2S ) = 88.3 kcal mol-1 (and BDEH2O(HOCH2CH2S ) = 86.5 kcal mol-1 with the assumption that S 2O(HOCH2CH2S? = S 2O(HOCH2CH2SH), see above). This value is in excellent agreement with the bonds strengths calculated above from thermochemical cycles. The pKa of the S group in cysteine has long been known319 and was recently determined as a function of temperature and ionic strength.320 It is very similar to the pKa of other alkyl thiols,315 which is not surprising since the side chain is fairly separated from the amine and carboxylate groups. The RS?+ H+ + e- RSH redox potential of cysteine, determined by Pr z and co-workers, is also very similar to the values determined by Surdhar and Armstrong (see above). Thus, the PCET thermochemistry of cysteine, glutathione, and alkyl thiols are very similar. Like phenols and ascorbate, the intermediates of single proton or electron transfer of RSH species are high in energy, indicating that thiols preferentially lose H?under normal physiological conditions. 5.8 C bonds and H2 Bell, Evans, and Polanyi showed in the 1930s that the facility of hydrogen atom abstraction from hydrocarbons parallels the gas phase homolytic BDE of the C bond being cleaved. Ever since then, BDEs have been central to organic free radical chemistry, and have been widely used for solution as well as gas-phase radical reactions: the gas phase BDE is the typical starting point for understanding the reactivity of C bonds. However, it should be noted that other factors besides C bond strength affect radical reactivity. For instance, the polar effect328 of electron withdrawing substituents makes C bonds much less reactive towards electrophilic radicals such as tBuO? as illustrated above in the lack of reactivity of acetonitrile solvent with this radical.198 This portion of the review is divided into three subsections. The first presents selected thermochemical data for simple hydrocarbons and small alkylaromatic compounds. Readers interested in a wider range of compounds are referred to specialized reviews on the acidities, redox potentials, and bond dissociation energies of organic compounds. In particular, Bordwell and co-workers measured pKas in DMSO for many compounds with weak C bonds, as well as a number of redox.