Ournal of Healthcare Physics (KJMP),' and 'Others.' The number of journalsOurnal of Medical Physics (KJMP),'

Ournal of Healthcare Physics (KJMP),” and “Others.” The number of journals
Ournal of Medical Physics (KJMP),” and “Others.” The amount of journals of which the initial author was in Radiation Oncology was ,025 composed of 70.eight (Table ). Because KoreaMed database will not specify a corresponding author, the very first author and hisher institution have been assumed as the most important author and institution within the investigation. The classifying process of the author’s institution was performed identically because the prior investigation had been . 2. Network analysis We used a social network evaluation software program, UCINET for windows ver. 6 (Analytic Technologies, Lexington, KY, USA) so that you can measure centrality indices. A sociogram was performed by a program, Netdraw ver. 2.090 (Analytic Technologies). The degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality were obtained, and compared to indicate the structural properties of a network and an author’s status inside the network of analysis institutions. An optimal set of nodes, maintaining and composing a network, was identified by a plan, KeyPlayer ver. .44 (Analytic Technologies). Within this study, distance weighted reach criterion strategy (KPPNEG) was made use of to analyze a crucial player. This system was developed to designate a node as a key player of which its connectivity drops dramatically or fragmentizes inside the case of random elimination of a key node [2]. For the cluster analysis, a clique evaluation of UCINET was conducted, as well as the minimum size was fixed in the worth of .ResultsWe classified the coauthorship patterns, along with the benefits are listed as following; the number of typeA, singleauthor articles with all the very first author whose affiliation PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25473311 was a radiation MedChemExpress (-)-Methyl rocaglate oncologist, was eight; typeB, singleinstitution articles together with the similar condition of 1st author, was 687; typeC, multipleinstitution articles with the identical situation, was 257; typeD, singleinstitution articles collaborated using a radiation oncologist, was 280; and typeE, multipleinstitutions articles having a collaboration, was 42. Except for the typeA, there was a total ,366 coauthored articles and 8,898 participated authors, therefore 6.5 coauthors per post in average have been calculated (Table ). Except for the typeA articles, Table 2 shows the amount of authors per short article; five.73 for typeB, 6.44 for typeC, 7.90 forMaterials and Techniques. Coauthorship analysis We found a total of ,447 articles and eight,976 complete author names in the KoreaMed database using the following condition; at lease one’s affiliation from authors was in either “Radiation Oncology” or “Therapeutic Radiology,” and their journals published in Korea between 99 and 200. The amount of authors according to subgroup Post no. Coauthorship B C D E Hospital Huge 5b) Other Year 2000 200 st author RO Non RO Journal JKOSTRO KJMP Othera)AU no. five.73 6.44 7.90 7.pvalue 0.687 257 280 42 637 729 533 833 944 422 73 950.005 7.23 5.89 0.000 5.49 7.six 0.025 5.92 7.82 0.000 five.56 7.02 7.7 Fig. . Quantity authors per post of as outlined by the coauthorship pattern. The result shows that there are significant variations among group B, C, D, and E (p 0.000). The difference in between group B and C was also considerable (p 0.002) but there was no considerable distinction in between group D and E (p 0.522). A, st radiation oncology (RO) single author; B, st RO various author single institution; C, st RO many authors a number of institutions; D, st RO many authors single institution; E, st RO multiple authors several institutions.RO, radiation oncology; JKOSTRO, Journal of Korean.