Share this post on:

R et al. 2004; Krause 2008a). Unfavorable social interactions in religious settings
R et al. 2004; Krause 2008a). Damaging social interactions in religious settings (i.e criticism and interpersonal conflicts with congregants, excessive demands, misdirected help and failures to supply required assistance) are distinct from social assistance and have especially damaging impacts on overall wellbeing and mental wellness (Ellison et al. 2009; Krause 2008a; Lincoln et al. 2003). Negative interactions occur across race and ethnic groups, but may well differ in frequency. Krause and Bastida’s study (20) identified that elderly African IMR-1A site Americans were more likely to encounter negative interaction with clergy and other congregants than older Whites and Mexican Americans. Similarly, Taylor et al. (203) located that African Americans have been extra most likely than Whites and Caribbean Blacks to report negative interactions with congregation members.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptFocus with the StudyThe reviewed body of research on religious involvement among Caribbean Blacks is an critical starting point for examining the demographic, immigration status and religious involvement correlates of churchbased social help. This present study examines four aspects of churchbased support networksreceipt of emotional assistance, receipt of general social support, provision of social assistance, and damaging interactionsamong Caribbean Blacks (operational definitions presented in Techniques section). Based on prior findings, we predict that quite a few with the demographic correlates of churchbased social support is going to be constant with findings from previous research. Namely, being older, married and female are going to be linked with greater levels of receiving emotional support and general assistance, andRev Relig Res. Author manuscript; obtainable in PMC 207 March 0.Nguyen et al.Pageproviding help to others. Education and household revenue might be positively connected with giving support to other people, but negatively connected with getting emotional help and general support from other individuals. Provided the lack of prior work inside this population group, no specific predictions are presented for demographic components as correlates of unfavorable interaction or for country of origin and immigration status in relation to churchbased assistance and unfavorable interaction. Lastly, we anticipate that religious involvement variables (e.g service attendance, interaction with church members) will probably be positively associated with receiving and giving social support. Prior research on family members networks indicates that greater involvement with network members (e.g PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24943195 interaction) is positively connected with reporting unfavorable interactions with household members (Lincoln et al. 202). Given this, we anticipate that church attendance and interaction with church members will similarly be linked with reports of damaging interaction with church members. Finally, offered preceding study on denominational differences in religious involvement, we anticipate that Catholics will demonstrate reduced and Pentecostals larger levels of churchbased support as in comparison with Baptists; no predictions concerning negative interaction are supplied.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript MethodsDataThis study makes use of information from the National Survey of American Life: Coping with Stress within the 2st Century (NSAL). The NSAL data were collected by the System for Study on Black Americans in the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Study (Jackson et al. 2004). A total o.

Share this post on: