Ipt; available in PMC 2015 September 01.Wood and BeierschmittPagehave provoked conversations about prevention. However, this larger agenda is held back, in part, by the structure of behavioral health financing. Philadelphia, for example, spends roughly 3 of its behavioral health budget on prevention and early intervention (Evans, 2013). Indeed, we live in an “age of austerity” (Innes, 2010), but there are nevertheless extensive service deficits for people living in the “grey zone” (Evans, 2013) of needed engagement (those falling outside of voluntary or involuntary commitment). The challenge facing policymakers, and the researchers who support them, is therefore one of focusing and interlocking resources to improve behavioral health while reducing antisocial and criminal behavior. This paper reports on BRDUMedChemExpress 5-BrdU findings from an action research project in Philadelphia aimed at exploring opportunities for enhanced upstream engagement. Recommendations include the need to move beyond a focus on what police can do to a wider conception of city agencies and business stakeholders who can influence vulnerable people and vulnerable spaces of the city. We argue for the need to develop shared principles and rules of engagement that clarify roles and stipulate how best to enlist city resources in a range of circumstances. Since issues of mental health, substance use and disorder are so tightly coupled, we stress the importance of establishing a data-driven approach to crime and disorder PNPP biological activity reduction in areas of the city we term “hotspots of vulnerability”. In line with a recovery philosophy, such an approach would aim to reduce opportunities for anti-social behavior among the dually labeled in ways consistent with “procedural justice” (Tyler, 2003). A significant body of empirical evidence already supports the notion that police will have greater legitimacy if they treat people with dignity, transparency and respect, and give them a “voice” during encounters (Sunshine Tyler, 2003; Tyler, 2004; Tyler, 2006). The present findings point to a need to take procedural justice seriously during behavioral health-related encounters, and to explore opportunities for embedding its principles in the work of all interventionists, including and beyond the police. Furthermore, data linkage across city agencies and organizations could contribute to enhanced case management practices for our most vulnerable populations. In general, a twin focus on “case management” and “place management” (Eck, 1995) may provide the pillars needed to enhance interventions along a continuum of engagement by police and their city partners.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript2. Research design2.1. Participatory action research This inquiry was designed within a “participatory action research” (PAR) model centered on university researchers working with practitioners as “co-researchers” (Reason Bradbury, 2008, p. 2) in framing a problem, collecting data, reflecting on findings and enlisting wider networks in furtherance of change (Schensul, 1999; Stringer, 2007). The iterative process of refining a project concept results in a shared language for both understanding the problem and identifying the practical challenges ahead (Mangold et al., 2012; Marks, Wood, Ally, Walsh, Witbooi, 2010). The means of refining a project concept is akin to a “slow burn” (Marks, et al., 2010, p. 6), where different project partners meet over time in pairs or in larger groups.Ipt; available in PMC 2015 September 01.Wood and BeierschmittPagehave provoked conversations about prevention. However, this larger agenda is held back, in part, by the structure of behavioral health financing. Philadelphia, for example, spends roughly 3 of its behavioral health budget on prevention and early intervention (Evans, 2013). Indeed, we live in an “age of austerity” (Innes, 2010), but there are nevertheless extensive service deficits for people living in the “grey zone” (Evans, 2013) of needed engagement (those falling outside of voluntary or involuntary commitment). The challenge facing policymakers, and the researchers who support them, is therefore one of focusing and interlocking resources to improve behavioral health while reducing antisocial and criminal behavior. This paper reports on findings from an action research project in Philadelphia aimed at exploring opportunities for enhanced upstream engagement. Recommendations include the need to move beyond a focus on what police can do to a wider conception of city agencies and business stakeholders who can influence vulnerable people and vulnerable spaces of the city. We argue for the need to develop shared principles and rules of engagement that clarify roles and stipulate how best to enlist city resources in a range of circumstances. Since issues of mental health, substance use and disorder are so tightly coupled, we stress the importance of establishing a data-driven approach to crime and disorder reduction in areas of the city we term “hotspots of vulnerability”. In line with a recovery philosophy, such an approach would aim to reduce opportunities for anti-social behavior among the dually labeled in ways consistent with “procedural justice” (Tyler, 2003). A significant body of empirical evidence already supports the notion that police will have greater legitimacy if they treat people with dignity, transparency and respect, and give them a “voice” during encounters (Sunshine Tyler, 2003; Tyler, 2004; Tyler, 2006). The present findings point to a need to take procedural justice seriously during behavioral health-related encounters, and to explore opportunities for embedding its principles in the work of all interventionists, including and beyond the police. Furthermore, data linkage across city agencies and organizations could contribute to enhanced case management practices for our most vulnerable populations. In general, a twin focus on “case management” and “place management” (Eck, 1995) may provide the pillars needed to enhance interventions along a continuum of engagement by police and their city partners.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript2. Research design2.1. Participatory action research This inquiry was designed within a “participatory action research” (PAR) model centered on university researchers working with practitioners as “co-researchers” (Reason Bradbury, 2008, p. 2) in framing a problem, collecting data, reflecting on findings and enlisting wider networks in furtherance of change (Schensul, 1999; Stringer, 2007). The iterative process of refining a project concept results in a shared language for both understanding the problem and identifying the practical challenges ahead (Mangold et al., 2012; Marks, Wood, Ally, Walsh, Witbooi, 2010). The means of refining a project concept is akin to a “slow burn” (Marks, et al., 2010, p. 6), where different project partners meet over time in pairs or in larger groups.
http://calcium-channel.com
Calcium Channel
